2. He denied the infallibility of the Scripture, the virgin birth, deity, and substitutionary atonement of Christ, the eternality of Hell, and other cardinal Bible doctrines, and promoted the critical modernistic views of the Old Testament. He interpreted the miracles of Christ in a naturalistic fashion, claiming, for example, that Jesus did not actually walk on the water but that he was probably walking in shallow water near the beach and it only appeared to the disciples that he was walking on the water.
In his book Daily Bible Reading: The Gospel of John, Barclay said that Jesus is divine but not God. He denied the miracle of Christ walking on the water and explains away the miracle of the feeding of the 5,000.
In Introducing the Bible (1972), Barclay made the following clear denial of the infallible inspiration of Scripture: “The answer has sometimes been given that this book was written by God; that every word and syllable and letter, every page and paragraph and sentence is the writing of God; that the book is the verbatim word of God. THAT VIEW IS THE BASIS OF WHAT IS CALLED VERBAL INSPIRATION. … FOR A VARIETY OF REASONS IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO HOLD THIS VIEW. … the Bible is rather the record and interpretation of these events rather than revelation in itself. The Bible is the story of God acting and men interpreting, or failing to interpret, the action of God” (Barclay, Introducing the Bible, pp. 138, 146). In this book Barclay claims that Moses did not write most of the Pentateuch (pp. 25,26), that the record of creation and the flood are composites and are not historically accurate (p. 26), that the book of Deuteronomy was not written until the days of the kings (p. 24), that the Pentateuch evolved over a long period of time (p. 28), that Isaiah was written by at least two unknown prophets (p. 35), that the authors of the Old Testament did not intend to write Scripture and their writings were not accepted as Scripture until centuries later (p. 42), that the record of the birth and infancy of Christ are legends which might not be historically accurate (p. 53), that the Gospels are “not primarily historical documents” (p. 54), that the Gospels contain errors (pp. 61, 141), that the Bible writers did not write under divine inspiration (p. 140), that Paul was merely giving his human opinion in 1 Corinthians 7 (p. 143), that the Greek of the book of Revelation is “so bad that a modern schoolboy would get into bad trouble for writing it” (p. 139).
In The Making of the Bible (1961), Barclay claims that the Gospels were not written until forty years after the death of Christ and were not given by inspiration of God but were haphazardly formed from various oral and written testimonies. He claims that it is a mere accident of history that there are four Gospels, and he repeats his assertion that they contain contradictions and errors. He claims that Paul told his readers that he wrote as a mere man and not by divine inspiration (p. 66). Barclay thinks the churches were so lackadaisical toward the apostolic writings that Paul’s epistles were forgotten and not used for a generation from A.D. 60 to 90, “laid away in some chest amongst the archives of their Churches, covered in dust and buried in neglect” (p. 68).
In William Barclay: A Spiritual Autobiography (Grand Rapids, 1977), Barclay wrote: “I am a convinced universalist. I believe that in the end all men will be gathered into the love of God” (p. 65).
Barclay’s contradictory stance on the deity of Christ was discussed in “The Enigmatic William Barclay” by Wayne Jackson, which appeared in the Christian Courier, August 11, 2003: “If you were to read some of Barclay’s writings regarding Jesus, you would be convinced that he believed in the Savior’s deity. For example, in his discussion of John 1:1, the famous theologian said that Jesus was ‘of the very same character and quality and essence and being as God.’ But when two acquaintances of this writer visited with Barclay at his home in Glasgow, in the spring of 1970, the distinguished professor strongly denied that he believed that Jesus was divine, and he insisted he never had endorsed that idea. He claimed that the Lord himself believed that he was divine, as did others, but personally, he did not. When Paul was cited as evidence to the contrary, the professor snapped: “I don’t care what Paul said.”
Barclay testified that the only error he would condemn was that of intolerance. “I am not likely to condemn a man’s beliefs; I shall only think him wrong if he refuses to extend to me the same sympathy that I extend to him” (Barclay, Testament of Faith, 1975, p. 30). Thus the following observation was applicable to Barclay, “The very thought of asking about heresy has itself become the new heresy. The archheresiarch is the one who hints that some distinction might be needed between truth and falsehood, right and wrong” (Thomas Oden, Requiem: A Lament in Three Movements, 1995, p. 47).
- Receive these reports by email
Sharing Policy: Much of our material is available for free, such as the hundreds of articles at the Way of Life web site. Other items we sell to help fund our expensive literature and foreign church planting ministries. Way of Life's content falls into two categories: sharable and non-sharable. Things that we encourage you to share include the audio sermons, O Timothy magazine, FBIS articles, and the free eVideos and free eBooks. You are welcome to make copies of these at your own expense and share them with friends and family. You may also post parts of reports and/or entire reports to websites, blogs, etc as long as you give proper credit (citation). A link to the original report is very much appreciated as the reports are frequently updated and/or expanded. Things we do not want copied and distributed are "Store" items like the Fundamental Baptist Digital Library, print editions of our books, electronic editions of the books that we sell, the videos that we sell, etc. The items have taken years to produce at enormous expense in time and money, and we use the income from sales to help fund the ministry. We trust that your Christian honesty will preserve the integrity of this policy. "For the scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn. And, The labourer is worthy of his reward" (1 Timothy 5:18). Questions? email@example.com
Goal:Distributed by Way of Life Literature Inc., the Fundamental Baptist Information Service is an e-mail posting for Bible-believing Christians. Established in 1974, Way of Life Literature is a fundamental Baptist preaching and publishing ministry based in Bethel Baptist Church, London, Ontario, of which Wilbert Unger is the founding Pastor. Brother Cloud lives in South Asia where he has been a church planting missionary since 1979. Our primary goal with the FBIS is to provide material to assist preachers in the edification and protection of the churches.
Offering: Offerings are welcome if you care to make one. If you have been helped and/or blessed by our material offerings can be mailed or made online with with Visa, Mastercard, Discover, or Paypal. For information see: www.wayoflife.org/about/makeanoffering.html.
Way of Life Literature
Publisher of Bible Study Materials
Way of Life Literature
Publisher of Bible Study Materials